Years ago watching the brilliant movie American Splendour with a friend, we were struck that the incredibly 'creative' protoganist Harvey Pekar could fill his days working as a mind-numbingly boring and mechanical document filing clerk.
The obvious question: was this 'mindless' job a necessary pre-condition, indeed a crucial space, for him to be able to create his wonderful and highly original comics?I recall reading a book on creativity by Edward de Bono who proposed that when our minds are occupied by more thoughtless or 'mechanical' tasks, other parts of our brain are allowed to roam free.
This struck me as amazing because it appeared to be a recipe for 'managed daydreaming' (you know, that type when you don't happen to be lying in a lush, green field looking up at clouds drift by in clear sunny, blue skies).
Of course it is not as easy as that. And while de Bono makes this point well, he then pursues his (brilliant, ground-breaking) theory of 'stimulated' inspiration with a variety of innovation techniques.
I suspect however that there is a more subtle ground to be discovered.
One where 'unstimulated' creativity can be encouraged and indeed fostered. And not simply in the shower. But in our everyday lives, workplaces and environments.
These questions have been piercing my mind of late. They form the foundation of my (just starting) exploration of sub-conscious inspiration. I'm calling it The Daydream Manifesto.